Limpin

Limpin v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20223:17-cv-01729California2,972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, Case No.: 17-CV-1729 JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING (1) PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR COURT’S LEAVE TO

AMEND THE ORIGINAL AND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Defendant.

UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE 60(B)(6)

17 (ECF Nos. 41, 46)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Melchor Karl T. Limpin’s Motion for Court’s Leave to Amend the Original and First Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Amend,” ECF No. 41) and Motion Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) (“Mot. for Relief,” ECF No. 46). Defendant the United States of America (“Defendant”) has opposed both Motions (“Amend Opp’n,” ECF No. 44; “Relief Opp’n,” ECF No. 49), and Plaintiff has filed replies in support of each Motion (“Amend Reply,” ECF No. 45; “Relief Reply,” ECF No. 50). The Court took both Motions under submission on the papers without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.