McCoy

McCoy v. McMahon

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20223:22-cv-00385California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES McCOY, Case No. 3:22-cv-00385-CAB-BGS Inmate #488-128,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 14 [ECF No. 2]

15 WENDY McMAHON, President, CBS;

AND

JULIE McNAMARA, Representative,

CBS,

DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 20 Plaintiff Charles McCoy, incarcerated at Southeast Correctional Institution (“SCI”) in Lancaster, Ohio, is proceeding pro se and has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl. ECF No. 1. McCoy did not prepay the civil filing fee required to commence a civil action at the time he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2. While his allegations are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.