De La Rosa v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARTHA DE LA ROSA, Case No.: 21-cv-1630-W-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. SANCTIONS
COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION [ECF 13]
14 Defendant. 15 16 Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation has filed a Motion for Sanctions seeking $ 6,884.38 in sanctions against Plaintiff Martha De La Rosa under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(2) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d)(1)(A)(i). (ECF 13.) Plaintiff has filed an Opposition. (ECF 14.) For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff’s initial deposition, conducted remotely, was not completed because she was unable to properly view exhibits. (ECF 13 at 2-3; ECF 14 at 3.) The screen she was
26 1 The following summary is drawn from both parties’ briefing and supporting declarations. (ECF 13-14.) There are differences in the parties’ characterization of 28 using for the remote deposition was scratched…