Hucker

Hucker v. Daub

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20223:21-cv-00577California4,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON HUCKER, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00577-RSH-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ CHRISTOPHER DAUB, et al.,

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO

Defendants. MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER, and

(2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 34] 20 Before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Application to Modify the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 34. Defendants seek to continue the fact discovery cutoff by approximately 75 days, to September 13, 2022, regarding specific discovery requests. Id. Defendants also seek to continue all other remaining case management deadlines, except the August 1 expert discovery cutoff. Id. Parties seeking to modify the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 26 at ¶ 18 (operative scheduling order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.