Montero

Montero v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20223:21-cv-01431California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KARINA MONTERO, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01431-L-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION TO CONTINUE

v.

DEPOSITION DEADLINES

HYATT CORPORATION, doing business as ANDAZ SAN DIEGO, [ECF No. 29] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 29. The parties seek to continue the percipient deposition deadline by approximately 60 days and the expert deposition deadline by approximately 30 days, to September 30, 2022. Id. Parties seeking to modify the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 16 at ¶ 20 (operative scheduling order, stating that “[t]he dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). “Good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.