Purpura

Purpura v. Does Members of the Inmate Classification Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20223:20-cv-01688California4,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK PURPURA, Case No.: 20-cv-1688 JAH (BGS)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DOES MEMBERS OF THE INMATE

DISMISS

CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, et al. 15 Defendants. [ECF 21] 17 Defendant R. Calvert has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Frank Purpura’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (ECF 21.) Defendant argues Plaintiff’s TAC still fails to state a claim under the Eighth Amendment because it lacks sufficient allegations Defendant acted with deliberate indifference. (Id.) Plaintiff has filed an Opposition and Defendant a Reply. (ECF 23-24.) This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge John A. Houston pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. For the reasons discussed below, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.