White

White v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20223:20-cv-02277California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LOUIS W., Case No.: 20cv2277-LL-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 21] KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding the Joint Motion for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. ECF Nos. 20, 21. The R&R recommends that the Commissioner’s decision be reversed, and that Judgment be entered reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding the matter for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF No. 21. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district court’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The district court must “make a de novo determination of those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.