Fuller
Fuller v. Green Dot Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY FULLER, Case No. 22-cv-01043-BAS-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO GREEN DOT BANK, PROCEED IFP (ECF No. 2)
Defendant. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 1)
(3) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF No. 3) 19 Plaintiff Stanley Fuller is proceeding pro se—without an attorney. He filed a handwritten complaint on July 19, 2022 against Defendant Green Dot Bank. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) He seeks $10,000 in monetary damages arising out of the alleged closure of his bank account by Defendant. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (IFP Mot., ECF No. 2) as well as a motion to appoint counsel (Mot. Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 3). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, DISMISSES WITHOUT…