Feldman
Feldman v. Sutton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CORY FELDMAN, Case No. 22-cv-341-MMA (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
THOMAS SUTTON, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 6] 17 18 19 On March 14, 2022, Plaintiff Cory Feldman initiated this action against Thomas Sutton (“Sutton”), the County of San Diego (the “County”), and DOES 1–50 (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendants now move to dismiss two claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, to which Defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 7, 8. The Court found the matter suitable for disposition on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 9. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND …