Bryson

Bryson v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20223:22-cv-00556California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD BRYSON, Case No.: 22cv00556

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO RAYMOND MADDEN, et al.,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Respondents. [ECF No. 6.]; AND

16 (2) DENYING MOTIONS FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE, EVIDENTIARY

HEARING, AND DISCOVERY

18 WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 2–4]

20 On April 20, 2022, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The Court dismissed the action on May 12, 2022 because Petitioner failed to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Petitioner was given until July 18, 2022 to either pay the filing fee or submit adequate proof he could not pay the fee. (Order, ECF No. 5.) On July 11, 2022, Petitioner filed a Motion to Proceed IFP. (IFP Mot., ECF No. 6.) Additionally, Petitioner has filed a Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.