Fisher

Williams v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20223:22-cv-00524California1,871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00524-GPC-NLS

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO RAYTHEL FISHER,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Respondent. [ECF No. 4];

16 (2) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL [ECF No. 6]; and

(3) DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

21 On April 14, 2022, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The Court dismissed the action on May 17, 2022 because Petitioner had failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement and because his criminal case was proceeding in state court; he also failed to state a federal claim. ECF No. 2. Petitioner was given until July 18, 2022, to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. Id. / / / On June 7, 2022, Petitioner filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.