Bedwell

Bedwell v. Fallbrook Plaza LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20223:22-cv-00093California2,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN BEDWELL, Case No. 22-cv-93-MMA (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

FALLBROOK PLAZA LP and DOES [Doc. No. 6] 1–10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 24, 2022, Plaintiff Shawn Bedwell (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Fallbrook Plaza LP (“Defendant”) and Does 1–10. Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 41 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq. (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51, et seq. (“Unruh Act”). See id. On May 27, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s ADA claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Doc. No. 6. Defendant further requests that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. Id. Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion. Doc. No. 7. The Court found the matter suitable for disposition on 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.