Kajjy

Munoz Perez v. Kajjy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20223:21-cv-01848California1,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGUSTIN MUÑOZ PEREZ, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1848-RSH-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

DENYING RENEWED MOTION

RANCHO POINT APARTMENTS INC.,

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

et al., PAUPERIS [ECF No. 11]; and Defendants.

DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 18 Plaintiff Agustin Muñoz Perez filed pro se a Complaint and Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) on November 1, 2021. See Compl., ECF No. 1; IFP App., ECF No. 2. On November 9, 2021, this Court denied Perez’s IFP Application because it was incomplete and dismissed the case without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because his Complaint did not meet the minimal pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). See Order, ECF No. 3. The Dismissal Order instructed Perez to amend his Complaint and file a complete IFP application by December 9, 2021, or the Court would dismiss his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.