McNamara

McNamara v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20223:21-cv-01245California5,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS W. MCNAMARA, as the Case No.: 21-CV-1245-LAB-WVG Court-Appointed Receiver for Triangle 12 Media Corporation; Apex Capital Group, ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES LLC; and their successors, assigns, affiliates, and subsidiaries, 14 Receiver, 15 v. 16 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; and

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

18 Defendants.

20 Pending before the Court are Thomas W. McNamara (“Receiver”) and Wells Fargo 21 & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Defendants”) (collectively, “Parties”) 22 respective briefs regarding discovery disputes the Receiver raises. (Doc. Nos. 28, 29.) The 23 Receiver seeks to compel Defendants’ responses to certain requests for production of 24 documents (“RFPs”) the Receiver propounded. Defendants object on a variety of grounds 25 to each of the RFPs at issue. The Court has reviewed and considered the entirety of the 26 Parties’ submissions. Having done so, the Court (1) SUSTAINS IN PART AND DENIES 27 IN PART Defendants’ objections to RFPs 23 through 26; (2) OVERRULES Defendants’ 28 objections to RFPs 34…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.