Sandoval
Sandoval v. Guldseth
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20223:19-cv-01584California6,154 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERTO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1584-JO-RBB
CDCR #AM-0186,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT GULDSETH’S vs. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 JUDGMENT [ECF No. 46]
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
DAVID GULDSETH, M.D, AND
Defendant. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
18 [ECF No. 55]
On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff Alberto Sandoval (“Plaintiff” or “Sandoval”), currently proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. In his complaint, Sandoval claims that Dr. David Guldseth violated his constitutional right to adequate medical care while he was housed at R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”).1 See id.
26 1 On February 11, 2022, Sandoval filed a motion which indicated he had changed addresses. See ECF No. 49. According to…