Roberts

Roberts v. Milles

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20223:22-cv-00956California2,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-956 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; (2) DISMISSING

MATT MILLES; CALI OLSON; and US

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

BANK,

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; AND Defendants. (3) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

(ECF Nos. 2, 3) 19 20 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants US Bank, bank manager Matt Milles, and Cali Olson removed money from Plaintiff’s bank account without authorization. See generally ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint, her IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion, DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.