Limpin

Limpin v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20223:22-cv-01150California821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, Case No.: 22-cv-1150-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

MERRICK GARLAND et al.,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

Defendants. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);

AND

15 2) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[Doc. No. 2] AS MOOT. 18

20 Plaintiff Melchor Karl T. Limpin filed this civil action against sixteen individuals, 21 including the current and former attorney general of the United States, on August 4, 2022. 22 [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 23 at the time of filing; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) 24 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2]. 25 A complaint filed by any person seeking to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 26 1915(a) is subject to sua sponte dismissal if it is “frivolous, malicious, fail[s] to state a 27 claim upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.