Wolf
Smith v. Wolf
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 G. SMITH, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01409-JAH-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION
DANIEL WOLF and PAUL
BEDINGTON,
16 Defendants. [ECF No. 17] 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff G. Smith’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order. (ECF No. 17). Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1), Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the Court’s Order sua sponte dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff’s Assault, Trespass, Trespass to Chattels, Conversion, Abuse of Process, Unjust Enrichment, Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Relations, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claims as time-barred. (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff claims she intended to bring the instant motion in January of 2022, and her failure to seek leave to amend her complaint and serve Defendants is the result of inadvertence and excusable neglect. Rule 60(b) (1) of the…