Widman

Widman v. Trans Union, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20223:22-cv-01129California1,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOVON WIDMAN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01129-JAH-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSUNION, LLC; EQUIFAX

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC;

[Doc. No. 2]

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., 2. DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) [Doc. 18 No. 1] 19 INTRODUCTION On August 1, 2022, Jovon Widman (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking damages against Transunion, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, Inc (collectively, “Defendants”) for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff failed to pay the required civil filing fees on time pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Instead, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.