Scherer

Scherer v. FCA US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20223:20-cv-02009California1,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCAS SCHERER and AMANDA Case No.: 20-cv-02009-AJB-BLM

SCHERER,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO SEAL (Doc. No. 76) v. 14 FCA US, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, 15 inclusive, Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to file documents under seal. (Doc. No. 76.) Plaintiffs wish to file redacted exhibits attached to the Declaration of Dara Tabesh in support of its motion for attorney fees, costs, and expenses. (Id. at 2.) There is no opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to seal. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. I. BACKGROUND This is a “Lemon Law” lawsuit under the Song Beverly Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1794(d), regarding Plaintiffs’ 2018 Chrysler Pacifica, identification number 2C4RC1EGXJR351970, that Plaintiffs purchased for $50,141.28. (Doc. No. 75 at 5.) On November 1, 2021, the Parties entered into a modified protective order 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.