Russell

Russell v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20223:21-cv-01029California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINE ANN RUSSELL, Case No.: 21cv1029-LL-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. RENEWED MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DR. LAURA MILLER MD; DR.

[ECF No. 28]

STACEY CHARAT MD; DR.

ALLYSON DAVIS MD; and OTHER

INDIVIDUALS,

17 Defendants.

19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Request for Court Appointed Attorney; motion for relief from the original judgement” which the Court construes as Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ECF No. 28. Plaintiff Russell proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed her Complaint for medical negligence against the named Defendants on May 28, 2021. ECF No. 1. On June 28, 2021, Judge Sabraw issued an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ECF No. 4. On January 7, 2022, this case was transferred to the undersigned Judge. ECF No. 13. For the reasons stated herein,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.