Horton
Horton v. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 RACHEL HORTON, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1160-W (AHG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
v. CAINE & WEINER COMPANY,
INC.’S MOTION FOR
CAINE & WEINER COMPANY,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC.
INC. AND EQUIFAX
46]
INFORMATION SERVICES LLC,
18 Defendants.
20 Pending before the Court is Defendant Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.’s (“C&W”) 21 Motion for Summary Judgment as to all of Plaintiff Rachel Horton’s claims. (Mot. [Doc. 22 46].) In the alternative, Defendant moves for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s 23 California Identity Theft Act (“ITA”) claim and Plaintiff’s California Consumer Credit 24 Reporting Act (“CCRAA”) claim on grounds that they are barred by the statute of 25 limitations. (Id.) Plaintiff Horton opposes both requests. (Opp’n [Doc. 44]; Supp. Opp’n 26 [Doc. 58].) Defendant also moves for judicial notice as to two previous court filings 27 28 from another matter. [Doc. 46-3]. And both Parties move to file…