Valles

Valles v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20223:21-cv-00819California3,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW VALLES, Case No.: 21-CV-819-GPC-WVG

Petitioner,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary,

DISMISS

Respondent. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On April 26, 2021, Andrew Valles, a state prisoner proceeding pro so, (“Petitioner”) filed a writ for habeas corpus petition (initial petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) Petitioner alleged two grounds in support of his initial petition, namely ineffective assistance of counsel and an unlawful induced guilty plea. On January 3, 2021, Petitioner amended his initial petition after exhausting his state court remedies (“Operative Petition” or “Petition”). (Doc. No. 16.) In the Operative Petition, Petitioner claims special circumstances entitle him to equitable tolling in support of his request for habeas corpus relief. On April 25, 2022, Kathleen Allison (“Respondent”) filed a Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.