Smithey

Smithey v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20223:21-cv-01248California5,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA S., Case No.: 21cv1248-AJB-MDD

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION RESOLVING

JOINT MOTION FOR JUDICIAL

14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Acting REVIEW AND AFFIRMING THE Commissioner of Social Security, COMMISSIONER’S FINAL

DECISION

Defendant.

17 [ECF No. 17] 18 Sandra S. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) regarding Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No. 1). The ALJ found that Plaintiff has not been disabled since March 11, 2015, the date the 24 25 1 Kilolo Kijakazi became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021 and is therefore substituted for Andrew M. Saul as the Defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § application was filed. (AR at 25). On July 11, 2022, the parties filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.