Purpura
Purpura v. Does Members of the Inmate Classification Committee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK PURPURA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01688-JAH-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING THE
v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF
R. CALVERT, AND DOES MEMBERS No. 25)
OF THE INMATE CLASSIFICATION
15 COMMITTEE, in their individual capacities, Defendant. 18 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) submitted to this Court by the Honorable Bernard G. Skomal, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss. When reviewing a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, the “district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made, and may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” Love v. Scribner, 691 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 1222 (S.D. Cal. 2010)1 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). …