Georges

Georges v. Phillip

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20223:21-cv-02095California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGNES GEORGES, et al, Case No.: 21cv2095-LAB (WVG)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. 1) DENYING AS MOOT IFP FELIX PHILLIP, et al, MOTION (Dkt. 8); Defendants. 2) DENYING APPOINTMENT OF 16 COUNSEL (Dkt. 9); AND 17 3) DISMISSING AMENDED 18 COMPLAINT (Dkt. 7)

Plaintiff Agnes Georges (“Georges”), proceeding pro se, has filed an Amended Complaint—this time against Defendants Joshua Magistrate Chief 911, K9, Felix Phillip, Larry Rothmer Law Firm Company, Gov Tower, Prince William, Woodbridge VA, Eastern District Dept Curtis Drive VA, Columbia District DC - Pentagon, and Comcast Business AT&T Internet. (Dkt. 7). Her Amended Complaint was previously filed improperly as a new matter in connection with Case No. 3:22-cv-00026-LAB-WVG, rather than as an amended complaint in the above- captioned case. Per the Court’s instructions, the Clerk of Court has since terminated Case No. 3:22-cv-00026-LAB-WVG and transferred all docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.