Scott

Scott v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20223:22-cv-00976California1,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON ANWAR SCOTT, Case No. 3:22-cv-0976-BAS-MSB

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

ROB BONTA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Pet., ECF No. 1.) For the reasons stated below, the Court DISMISSES the Petition without prejudice and with leave to amend. I. FAILURE TO SATISFY FEE FILING REQUIREMENT Because Petitioner has failed to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), this Court cannot proceed with this action. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C.A. § foll. 2254. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice the Petition. The Court cannot proceed unless and until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed IFP. // // // …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.