Griffin

Griffin v. Carvana LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20223:22-cv-00939California986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEREMY-LUKE GRIFFIN, Case No.: 22-cv-0939-DMS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS CARVANA LLC, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff Jeremy-Luke Griffin, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1–2). The matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the Court denies the motion. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999); Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.