Walker
Walker v. SSA
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Annette Walker, Terry James Walker, and Case No.: 22-CV-00860 Davis Bros. Lumber Co., 12 Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
v. FORMA PAUPERIS AND (2) SSA, et al., DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
CORPORATION TO OBTAIN
Defendants. COUNSEL 17 [ECF No. 2] 18
20 Plaintiffs Annette Walker, Terry James Walker, and Davis Bros. Lumber Co. filed 21 the present action on June 10, 2022, and Plaintiff Annette Walker subsequently moved for 22 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1–2. For the reasons discussed 23 below, the application to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is denied. 24 Unless the filing fee is paid, each natural person seeking to proceed as a plaintiff— 25 in this case, Annette Walker and Terry James Walker—must file his or her own separate 26 application to proceed IFP. See Gulbransen v. Far N. Reg’l Ctr., No. CIV S-11-1231 JAM, 27 2011 WL 2462994, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 17, 2011). Here, it appears that the pending…