Franklin

Franklin v. Scripps Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20223:22-cv-00367California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE FRANKLIN, individually Case No. 22-cv-367-MMA (MDD) and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, INTERIM ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED Plaintiffs,

MOTION TO STAY

14 v. [Doc. No. 15] SCRIPPS HEALTH, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On March 21, 2022, Plaintiffs Michelle Franklin and Irene Gamboa initiated this putative class action against Scripps Health (“Defendant”) and DOES 1 through 10. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant now moves the Court to stay this case pending resolution of parallel state court actions pursuant to the Colorado River doctrine. See Doc. No. 15. Plaintiffs have filed a statement of non-opposition. See Doc. No. 18. Plaintiffs specifically request that a stay be “without prejudice to seeking to lift the stay at a later time as warranted by the facts and law in this case and related matters.” Id. at 1. Federal courts have a “virtually unflagging obligation . . . to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.