Roberts
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-967-GPC(AGH)
Plaintiff,
ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING
v. PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO
STUDIO 15 MANGENT, RUTH
STATE A CLAIM AND DENYING
RIVERIA, JOLINDA QUILTIA,
MOTION FOR EX PARTE Defendants. HEARING 15 [Dkt. No. 14.] 16 Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts, proceeding pro se, filed an amended complaint1 against Defendants Ruth Riveria, Jovanna Q., and Studio15 Management and a motion for an ex parte hearing. (Dkt. No. 13, FAC; Dkt. No. 14.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES the amended complaint for failure to state a claim and DENIES motion for ex parte hearing as moot. A. Sua Sponte Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) A complaint filed by any person proceeding in forma pauperis2, (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is subject to mandatory sua sponte review and dismissal by the
26 1 The…