Roberts

Roberts v. Studio 15 Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20223:22-cv-00967California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-967-GPC(AGH)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

v. PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

STUDIO 15 MANGENT, RUTH

STATE A CLAIM AND DENYING

RIVERIA, JOLINDA QUILTIA,

MOTION FOR EX PARTE Defendants. HEARING 15 [Dkt. No. 14.] 16 Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts, proceeding pro se, filed an amended complaint1 against Defendants Ruth Riveria, Jovanna Q., and Studio15 Management and a motion for an ex parte hearing. (Dkt. No. 13, FAC; Dkt. No. 14.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES the amended complaint for failure to state a claim and DENIES motion for ex parte hearing as moot. A. Sua Sponte Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) A complaint filed by any person proceeding in forma pauperis2, (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is subject to mandatory sua sponte review and dismissal by the

26 1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.