Davall
Davall v. Cordero
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v. REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN,
Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 68, 71] 16 17 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to protect him from an excessive risk to his safety. See generally Doc. No. 1. Before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants’ Motion,” and, collectively, the “Motions”). See Doc. Nos. 68, 71. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1, the undersigned Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to United States District Judge …