Davall

Davall v. Cordero

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20223:20-cv-01968California7,936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN,

Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 68, 71] 16 17 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to protect him from an excessive risk to his safety. See generally Doc. No. 1. Before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants’ Motion,” and, collectively, the “Motions”). See Doc. Nos. 68, 71. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1, the undersigned Magistrate Judge submits this Report and Recommendation to United States District Judge …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.