Kinney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 20cv1354

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AMENDED

v. MOTION TO RECONSIDER DAVID KINNEY; STORIX, INC.; et al., Defendants. 14 On March 30, 2022, the Court granted Defendant Storix, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Anthony Johnson’s remaining cause of action on grounds of (1) impermissible claim splitting between two district courts and (2) res judicata (the “March 30 Order”).1 The Clerk entered judgment against Plaintiff on the same day. On April 6, 2022, Plaintiff first filed a motion to reconsider, withdrew it, and then filed an amended motion to reconsider the March 30 Order, arguing that the Court committed “manifest errors of law” and “failed to acknowledge numerous arguments and authority in [his] opposition” to the motion to dismiss. See Dkt. 76-1 at 2. For the following reasons, the Court denies Plaintiff’s amended motion to reconsider [Dkt. 76]. 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff…