United States v. Estate of Tom L. Meyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20223:22-cv-00727California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States of America, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00727-RSH-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND

ESTATE OF TOM L. MEYER, aka

EFFECTUATE SERVICE

“Tommy Meyer,” by and through his 15 personal representative and/or successors- [ECF No. 14] in-interest; et al.,

Defendants. 18 Plaintiff United States of America and Defendants Cynthia L. Meyer, Bradley A. Meyer, and Chad H. Meyer jointly move for an extension of time to respond to the First Amended Complaint and serve process on the yet-to-be appointed personal representative of the Estate of Tom L. Meyer. ECF No. 14. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires a plaintiff to serve a defendant “within 90 days after the complaint is filed.” Courts use a two-step analysis to decide whether to extend the prescribed time for service of a complaint. In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d at 512 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.