Courson

Courson v. Regency RV

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20223:21-cv-00980California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WILLIAM COURSON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-0980-BAS-MSB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 35)

REGENCY RV, et al.,

Defendants.

17 On August 22, 2022, the parties have jointly filed a Stipulation of Dismissal 18 (“Stipulation”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 19 (Stipulation, ECF No. 35.) The Stipulation is signed by both parties and seeks dismissal 20 of this action with prejudice. 21 Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action 22 by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or 23 moved for summary judgment, or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties 24 who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 25 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a compliant notice 26 or stipulation, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.