Grano

Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20223:18-cv-01818California4,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT GRANO, et al., Case No.: 3:18-cv-1818-RSH-BLM

Plaintiffs,

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING

v. AND DENYING PARTIES’

MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS

SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,

UNDER SEAL

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 333, 335, 354, & 366] AND ALL RELATED CASES 17 There have been four motions for leave to file documents under seal pending in this case for nearly a year. The motions to seal all relate to summary judgment motion briefing. The Court addresses each motion to seal separately below, granting and denying the motions in part. I. Legal Standard Courts have historically recognized a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978). “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.