Faison

Faison v. Branstad

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20223:22-cv-01063California1,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MATTHEW L. FAISON, Case No.: 22-cv-1063-MMA (MSB)

INMATE #038634-G2-203,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. v. § 1915A(b) AND DENYING MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

BRANSTAD; ANDREW LIPMAN;

PAUPERIS AS MOOT

BRIAN THOMPSON; JIMMY WHITE,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 2] 16 17 Matthew L. Faison (“Plaintiff”), an inmate incarcerated at the Wakulla Correctional Institution in Crawfordville, Florida and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff claims Defendant “Branstad et al.,” an “AT&T Brokerage-Dealer-Boss,” has been “constantly conspiring apparently forming a scenario, of his employee(s), to take exclusive control of the commercial television financial market…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.