Roberts
Roberts v. Milles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-956 JLS (BLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT
MATT MILLES; CALI OLSON; and US
BANK,
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 6) 16 17 18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’ Amended Complaint (“Amended Compl.,” ECF No. 6). Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants US Bank, Matt Milles, and Cali Olson (collectively, “Defendants”) removed money from Plaintiff’s bank account without authorization and that she was assaulted by one or more of Defendants. See generally Amended Compl. Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and the applicable law, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for the reasons that follow. /// LEGAL STANDARD Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), her Amended Complaint requires a…