Anderson
Anderson v. Hennessy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICAH ANDERSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0280-GPC-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S JOHN L. HENNESSY; PICHAI
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
SUNDAR; JOHN KENT WALKER;
PAUPERIS
ALPHABET INC.,
Defendants.
AND
17 (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 20 On February 28, 2022 Plaintiff Micah Anderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants John L. Hennessy, Pichai Sundar, John Kent Walker, and Alphabet Inc. (“Defendants”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. \ \ \ \ \ \ DISCUSSION I. Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma…