Anderson

Anderson v. Hennessy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20223:22-cv-00280California1,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICAH ANDERSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0280-GPC-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S JOHN L. HENNESSY; PICHAI

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

SUNDAR; JOHN KENT WALKER;

PAUPERIS

ALPHABET INC.,

Defendants.

AND

17 (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 20 On February 28, 2022 Plaintiff Micah Anderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants John L. Hennessy, Pichai Sundar, John Kent Walker, and Alphabet Inc. (“Defendants”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. \ \ \ \ \ \ DISCUSSION I. Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.