Yablonsky

Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20223:18-cv-01122California2,793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA John Henry YABLONSKY, Case No.: 3:18-cv-1122-AGS Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR

v.

RECONSIDERATION (ECF 146),

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF RENEWED OBJECTION (ECF 144),

CORRECTIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING

7 REHABILITATIONS, et al., (ECF 157), AND TO NAME DOE Defendants. DEFENDANTS (ECF 159) 9 After the Court denied his request to file a third amended complaint (ECF 138), plaintiff John Henry Yablonsky timely moved for reconsideration. He has since supplemented with two other motions: one seeking to file a supplemental declaration to his second amended complaint and another to name the Doe defendants in that complaint. In other words, he again wants to amend his operative complaint to join five additional defendants and add a right-to-petition claim. For the below reasons, that request is denied. BACKGROUND This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case, brought by pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.