Roberts

Roberts v. Social Security Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20223:22-cv-01123California1,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-1123 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

SOCIAL SECURITY DEPARTMENT; (2) DISMISSING ACTION

BERYLE; CARLOS MENDINE;

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ALLIENA MARTINEZ; and

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES

JOHN, Social Rep., REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Defendants. AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL

(ECF Nos. 2, 3) 21 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’ Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2) and Request for Appointment of Counsel (“Counsel Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and the applicable law the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s IFP Motion, DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Counsel Motion, and DISMISSES …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.