Brazell

Brazell v. Uddenberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20223:19-cv-01084California2,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE L. BRAZELL, Case No.: 19-CV-1084 JLS (MSB)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS v.

CORPUS

14 CLIFF J. UDDENBERG, Commander, United States Navy Commandant, (ECF No. 15) Naval Brig Miramar, 16 Defendant.

18 Presently before the Court is Petitioner Jesse Brazell’s (“Petitioner”) Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (“Am. Pet.,” ECF No. 15). Also before the Court is the Government’s (“Government” or “Respondent”) Answer and Return to the Amended Petition and Motion for Summary Judgment (“Answer,” ECF No. 16), and Petitioner’s Traverse (“Resp.,” ECF No. 19). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). ECF No. 18. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the relevant law, the Court DENIES the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. /// /// BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.