Macias

I. BACKGROUND

23 On June 6, 2017, the District Judge entered an order granting in part Plaintiff’s 24 request for attorney’s fees and cost, awarding $87,578.00 to Judgment Creditor. ECF No. 25 173. On June 22, 2017, the Clerk of the Court issued an Abstract of Judgment reflecting 26 an $87,578.00 money judgment in favor of Judgment Creditor against Judgment Debtor 27 (the “Judgment”). ECF No. 180. The Judgment has not been paid. ECF No. 202 at 2. 28 Judgment Creditor represents that Judgment Debtor resides in San Diego County. Judgment Creditor does not state whether or when it has previously examined Judgment Debtor; instead, Judgment Creditor only indicates that it served a set of interrogatories and a set of requests for production of documents on Judgment Debtor. Id. at 2. II. DISCUSSION A. Applicable Law Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 authorizes federal courts to enforce a money judgment by writ of execution. Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1). “The procedure on execution— and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution—must accord with the procedure of the state…