Valentin

Valentin v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20223:21-cv-00643California5,830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 PAUL V., Case No.: 21cv0643-MDD 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER RESOLVING JOINT

13 v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND AFFIRMING THE KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Acting COMMISSIONER’S FINAL 15 Commissioner of Social Security, DECISION 16 Defendant. [ECF No. 24] 18 Paul V. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) regarding Plaintiff’s Title XVI application for Supplemental Security Income. (ECF No. 1). The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff was not disabled and 24 25 1 Kilolo Kijakazi became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021 and is substituted for Andrew M. Saul as the Defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); denied Plaintiff’s claim for benefits from September 1, 2011, through the date of the decision, February 11, 2020. (AR at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.