Sekerke

Sekerke v. Leo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20223:19-cv-00034California5,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-JO-RBB

CDCR #BP-1899,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY vs. JUDGMENT PURSUANT 14 TO Fed. R. Civ. P.

ARTURO LEON;

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

[ECF Nos. 140, 146] 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Keith Sekerke (“Plaintiff” or “Sekerke”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1.1 Plaintiff claims that Defendants Arturo Leon and County of San Diego (“Defendants”) violated his constitutional rights by denying him adequate medical care while he was housed at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”). See id. 3-5. Defendants moved for summary judgment of 24 25 26 1 Throughout this Order and for ease of consistency and reference, the Court will cite to each document in the record using both the number assigned to the document and the page number automatically 28 Plaintiff’s claims. For the reasons stated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.