Kimball

Kimball v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20223:19-cv-01767-JLSCalifornia3,041 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case Nos.: 15CR0902-JLS 19CV1767-JLS

Plaintiff/Respondent, ORDER: 11 1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE,

OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER

v. 28 USC § 2255; 14 2) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY;

SCOTT HOWARD KIMBALL (1),

3) DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL 17 DISCOVERY; and Defendant/Petitioner. 4) DENYING SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 6 MOTION 20 [ECF Nos. 200, 207 and 209]

22 Presently before the Court are Defendant Scott Howard Kimball’s Motion to Vacate, 23 Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 24 (ECF No. 200), Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 207), and Defendant’s 25 Supplemental Rule 6 Motion (ECF No. 209). The Government has filed a Response in 26 Opposition to Defendant’s Section 2255 Motion (ECF No. 202), and Defendant has filed a 27 Rebuttal to the Government’s Response (ECF No. 204). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.