Satterwhite

Satterwhite v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20223:21-cv-01074California4,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK S., Case No.: 21-cv-01074-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF Nos. 11; 13] Defendant. 16 17 On June 8, 2021, Plaintiff Frank S. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability and disability insurance benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and replies. After a careful review and for the reasons set forth 24 25 26 The Court notes that Plaintiff was to file a merits brief rather than a motion for summary judgment. CivLR 7.1(e)(6)(e). Likewise, the Commissioner was to file only an opposition to Plaintiff’s merits brief. Id. No other motions were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.