Keith

Keith v. The City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20223:21-cv-01782California2,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBRA A. KEITH, Case No.: 21CV1782-JAH-JLB

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN

v. PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the City of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or the “City”) motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 8). The motion has been fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 8, 16, 17). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Debra A. Keith (“Keith” or “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against the City on October 18, 2021 under U.S.C. Section 1983, seeking “[i]njunctive relief mandating the City of San Diego to return [P]laintiff’s street back to its original design/condition prior to the city’s alteration, in order for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.