Nash

Nash v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20223:22-cv-01026California567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHOCOLATE N., Case No.: 3:22-cv-1026-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security, [Doc. No. 8] Defendant.

17 On July 14, 2022, plaintiff Chocolate N. commenced this action against Kilolo 18 Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of the Commissioner’s 19 final adverse decision. Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff’s attorney of record did not sign the Complaint. 20 See id. On July 14, 2022, plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Doc. Nos. 21 2 and 2-1. On July 22, 2022, this Court denied plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma 22 Pauperis because he did “not provide[] the Court with any information regarding his 23 monthly expenditures, and the Court [was] therefore unable to assess” his ability to pay 24 court costs and also afford the necessities of life. Doc. No. 4 at 2 (citing Escobedo v. 25 Applebees,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.