Papciak

Breaking Code Silence v. Papciak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20223:21-cv-00918California3,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BREAKING CODE SILENCE, Case No. 21-cv-00918-BAS-DEB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES v. (ECF Nos. 54, 57) 13 CHELSEA PAPCIAK aka FILER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Presently before the Court are Defendant Jennifer Walker’s motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF No. 57) and Defendants Jenna Bulis, Chelsea Filer, Martha Thompson, and BreakingCodeSilence, Inc.’s motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF No. 54). Plaintiff Breaking Code Silence (“BCS”) filed a response to both motions. (ECF Nos. 60–61.) The Court finds these matters suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motions for attorneys’ fees. I. BACKGROUND1 BCS “is a nonprofit public benefit corporation incorporated by survivors of institutional child abuse and activists with the mission of helping survivors of institutional 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.